The Top Five Most Overrated Directors
5 - M. Night Shyamalan
4 - George Lucas
3 - Kevin Smith
2 - Oliver Stone
1 - Brian DePalma
We received some unusual selections and a lot you'd expect. Tim Burton, David Fincher, Woody Allen, Michael Bay, Spike Lee, Ridley Scott, David Lynch, Steven Soderbergh, Steven Spielberg, Sidney Lumet, Quentin Tarantino, Blake Edwards, Joel Schumacher, Guy Ritchie, Todd Solondz, Robert Altman, Eli Roth, George Clooney, Rob Reiner, and Michael Moore all received votes.
For that matter, so did Doug Liman, William Friedkin, Terrence Malick, Orson Welles (oh, please...), Francis Ford Coppolla, Ron Howard, John Carpenter, Rob Zombie, Ang Lee, Christopher Nolan, and Peter Jackson.
We like our five, although the measure of what's overrated is certainly in doubt.
A case could be made that Night Shyamalan is not overrated because people no longer rate him very highly. I would dispute that and say that a lot of moviegoers if not cinephiles still think the guy makes above average movies, even though we're six years removed from him holding that distinction. Strange, isn't it, that his career has gotten worse with each new movie?
George Lucas belongs on this list for one good reason: He's directed six movies. Half of them are good while the other half are unoriginal and almost laughable. On the plus side: THX 1138, American Graffiti, and Star Wars. The negatives: The second Star Wars trilogy, which forever unmasked him as a guy with great ideas but terrible technique.
Kevin Smith received more votes than any other director for this list, and he's certainly one of my personal picks. He's also clearly loved or hated. I just don't get the apologists who have had to clean up after Smith's last few movies. Clerks was very good and a bit revolutionary. Chasing Amy was solid, although not one you'd want part of your legacy to hang on. You could vote for Dogma, although I personally felt it was overpopulated and not terribly funny. Beyond those, you don't have much to work with. And Dogma was nine years ago.
The constant revisiting of Jay and Silent Bob is boring, Clerks II couldn't recapture that moment in time, Jersey Girl is a below-average Ben Affleck movie...and that's saying something. He writes solid dialogue, but Smith struggles with overall storylines and lately, even his dialogue hasn't been there to cover up for his very unspectacular filmmaking.
The top two have made some excellent films, but the majority of their movies are incredibly narcissistic, which is one reason you don't see a Spielberg or a Tim Burton on this list. Their central focus is still to engage and entertain an audience. Oliver Stone forgot that lesson over a decade ago and Brian De Palma has been MIA for 20 years.
Stone's most breathtaking moment is JFK, but how the man who made that film couldn't handle the mass confusion of Natural Born Killers (there's a point to it, right?), got lost in Colin Farrell's reflection in Alexander and somewhere in between decided U-Turn was a good idea is beyond me. Like most of the filmmakers on this list, the good stuff is earlier in his career. World Trade Center wasn't bad - but it's certainly second-tier filmmaking for a guy with Stone's abilities - and we'll see what W. holds
In Stone's mind, though, it seems his movies became more about who was making them than why they were being made.
Brian De Palma was never all that good, frankly, which is why he tops the list. I mean, he's never made a movie as good as JFK. Some would argue Scarface is a masterpiece, but I give credit to - here's a coincidence - Oliver Stone's script over anything in the orgiastic direction of De Palma. And it's significantly overrated, too, by the way. Still, that's his career highlight, and Carrie and Blow Out before it are pretty good, as are The Untouchables and Carlito's Way after it. None of them are classics, but they're better than the rest of his stuff.
So five movies since 1977 have been good to very good. Look at the number of bad movies on the other side of the scale. Without naming them, I count 11 bad to very bad movies in that same span. Redacted and Black Dahlia, his most recent flicks, are among the very worst films of this decade. And yet, people still let him make movies. Unbelievable.













Reader Comments (3)
I was ready to blast this post. I consider myself a fan of at three directors on the list (Smith, Shamalyan and DePalma) but after reading it, it made sense. Smith's best work was definitely Clerks. I've always viewed him as more of a writer then kind of a director, so I'll back you on that. Shamalyan has been progressing steadily downhill since Sixth Sense. Sixth Sense was great. Unbreakable I thought was really good. Signs was good. The Village was meh. And I couldn't get through 20 minutes of Lady in the Water. So I'm with you there. DePalma's fault, I think, is that he has been making the same movie for the past thirty years. I loved the Untouchables. I think its a fantastic movie. But not much since.
So if nothing else you've made me re-define the word "fan" to me. I'm a fan of these directors films, but not necessarily their directing talents, I guess.
Thanks Colin.
But for my money, most overrated: Michael Bay, Oliver Stone, Robert Rodriguez, Tarantino, and Spike Lee. I was tempted to say Ridley Scott because I think he alternates between brilliant and hackneyed and it infuriates me.
But its a good list you've got here!
For your (overrated) consideration; Rob Reiner from 1994 on: North (prompting Roger Ebert's famous "hated, hated, etc." review), The American President, Ghosts of Mississippi, The Story of Us, Alex and Emma (several versions of Kate Hudson, all awful ;( ), Rumor Has It..., The Bucket List (his only hit during that period, but still...)- quite a long way from his glory years; yes, it's good to be Hollywood royalty...
Yeah, I think he was an also-ran. Problem is, nobody ever said he was "brilliant." Good, yes. Solid, sure. But he never toppled from Mt. Olympus. Same thing with Michael Bay. Although, I wouldn't even call him good. Serviceable, at best.
As for Ridley Scott, Empire - or its readers - voted him the fifth best director ever. That's simply untrue.