The Top Five Steves
5 - George Stevens
4 - Stephen King
3 - Steve Martin
2 - Steve McQueen
1 - Steven Spielberg
This category turned out to be more difficult than I think anyone would've believed. Steve is such a common name, and - no offense to any Steves who might be reading this - apparently, it's a name meant for common achievement, more often than not. Think about it: No Presidents are named Steve, only four guys named Steve have ever won MVP awards in the NFL, NBA, or Major League Baseball...and only one of those was before 1990, and we actually had to go with Steve as a last name to fill out our Top Five.
Them's the breaks, I guess.
Here are some of the Steves that didn't make our list: Steve Buscemi, Steve Guttenberg (seriously), Stephen Soderbergh, Steve Carell, Stephen Baldwin, Steve Zahn, Stephen Tobolowski (!), Stephen Colbert, Steven Culp, Stephen Dorff (I love his golf videos...but no), and the one and only Steven Seagal.
Ouch.
So what separates these five? Well, it should be obvious. The name least known here is definitely George Stevens, our number five selection. But he directed a great many legendary films, from Giant to Shane to A Place in the Sun to The Diary of Anne Frank to The Greatest Story Ever Told. Yes sir, that's variety.
I couldn't put Stephen King much higher than number four because he hasn't done much in film. Oh sure, his contribution is enormous, but Pet Semetary, Silver Bullet, and Sleep Walkers are his only real credits as a screenwriter, outside of a few TV credits here and there. So, yeah, movies would be far different without him...but I'll take Frank Darabont's Shawshank screenplay anytime.
The top three were on just about every list we received. Steve Martin, despite what you may think of his output these days - and my opinion is very, very low - there was a good ten years there where he was making some of the best movies of any comedian in Hollywood. From The Jerk to Parenthood, with The Man with Two Brains, Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid, All of Me, Planes, Trains and Automobiles, Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, and Roxanne sandwiched in between, he built a formidable decade.
I can't fathom what went wrong in his career, though. It's just sad now.
Steve McQueen is Steve McQueen. I don't think I need to elaborate, do I?
As for Mr. Spielberg, look, you could argue that only a handful of people at any point in history have had a bigger influence on motion pictures than the most profitable director of all time. Certainly, if we're limiting it to creative artists, that list is maybe, what, three? Maybe?
He invented the summer blockbuster, he's made tremendous popcorn movies, very serious and introspective films, and works faster and more often than just about anyone else I can think of. Even if you eliminated his five best films, he still would've directed Jaws, The Color Purple, Munich, Jurassic Park, and Minority Report. That's nothing to sneeze at.
If you think you could sneeze at it, pick any other director and chop out his or her five best movies and see what you're left with. Quentin Tarantino would only have Death Proof and Francis Coppola would lose two Godfathers plus The Conversation, Apocalypse Now, and The Outsiders. Uh-huh. Thought so.













Reader Comments (5)
I would take Steve Buscemi over Stephen King any day. The majority of King's credit to the film industry are books, novels, or short stories that SOMEONE ELSE turned into a movie. Should King get credit for writing books that happen to also churn out good "made for TV" movies? I understand your point regarding the movies that he HAS written, but that list is not long enough or quality enough to place him over an actor of Buscemi's quality. I love to watch that guy. To quote a line from one of Buscemi's movies, The Big Lebowski, "Donny, you're out of your element." In this case Donnie, would be Stephen King!
Really? You think the overall impact of Steve Buscemi is greater than the overall impact of Stephen King? One guy's responsible for The Shining, Misery, Carrie, Stand by Me, and The Running Man, and is at least partially responsible for Shawshank and The Green Mile, and the other guy's responsible for several memorable supporting characters in movies that were great anyway. OK then.
He wrote the NOVELS for The Shining, Misery, Carrie, Stand by Me, and The Running Man. I guess the question is should the writer of a book which was adapted into a movie get the credit for the movie? I don't think so, but that is just me. He wrote a book. Someone else made it into a movie. Shouldn't the screenwriters or others who put it onto the screen get credit for the movie? You know more than I do about the industry and movies in general, but that is just my train of thought. Are you saying that since he was the brain beind the concepts of the movies, him writing the book, that he deserves the credit?
Well, he certainly deserves credit for coming up with all of the concepts. We're talking about some of the great horror movies ever made...plus Shawshank. It's not like I'm bucking for Dean Koontz or anything. But his impact is enormous, and his stories have consistently been adapted over the last 30 years, more than any author in history, if you look at the number of distinct titles. The world of motion pictures has moved more by his contributions than by Steve Buscemi's, that's all I'm saying.
I was just looking at it from a different perspective, but your last line convinced me to see it your way...maybe...somewhat...ha!! No, you're right. You win the debate this time... :)