website tracking
Search The Big Picture
« Trailer - Jean-Claude Van Damme is Jean-Claude Van Damme in 'JCVD' | Main | Just Say No to Nic Cage Movies »
Sunday
12Oct2008

Box Office - 'Chihuahua' Wins Again, 'Body of Lies' Tanks

How 'bout that Body of Lies? Leonardo DiCaprio, Russell Crowe, Ridley Scott...sounds like it's up your alley, right? You couldn't prove that looking at the box office numbers, as the new espionage thriller opened with an uninspiring $13 million, only good enough for third place, according to weekend estimates released by Box Office Mojo.

Beverly Hills Chihuahua - which, it should be pointed out, does not have an overt political message - finished in first place again, taking in another $17 million, and the new horror movie Quarantine leapfrogged Body of Lies for second place. Quarantine was really the only new release to get much traction, with The Express finishing in sixth place and City of Ember debuting at number ten.

Instead, it was the movies that had been in theaters at least a week that attracted crowds, with only one carryover in the top 15 losing more than half of its attendance numbers from the previous weekend.

I would guess that Quarantine and Lies shared a fair percentage of the same audience, so maybe that's a contributing factor to the disappointing debut for the Leo-Crowe flick. The movie faces a huge uphill battle to turn a profit; it might make $40 million domestically against a $70 million budget. But the news is even worse for City of Ember, a $40 million fantasy that earned less than 10% of its budget back this weekend. That film is on pace for a $15 million domestic run, which will make the international receipts much more important.

The Top Five:

1 - Beverly Hills Chihuahua ($17.5 million)
2 - Quarantine ($14.2 million)
3 - Body of Lies ($13.1 million)
4 - Eagle Eye ($11 million)


5 - Nick and Norah ($6.5 million)

Share/Save/Bookmark

Reader Comments (5)

"Body of Lies" is a boring title and it looks like every other movie of it's type. That's why no one wants to see it. I think audiences are trending away from seeing movies based only on the stars. I like the cast and I think DeCaprio is one of the finest actors of his generation, but very little interested me about this movie. There's just something about it I can't quite put my finger on.

Monday, October 13, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMRPigg

The marketing was awful. They could've maybe found a better title, but the trailers were bad. Bad.

Monday, October 13, 2008 | Registered CommenterColin Boyd

DiCaprio is playing to my father's generation...not mine.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterWill

Yeah, he should be Tony Stark. He should be RockNRolla. He should be Brad Pitt's character in Burn After Reading (Sorry Brad!). He should be Jason Bourne!

Instead, he's trying to be Pacino circa 1977.

Dad would'a loved him in '77!

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMemo

Yeah Brad! Act your effing age!

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterWill

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>