website tracking

Search The Big Picture

« Go Behind the Scenes of 'The Dark Knight' | Main | Movie Trailer - 'Quarantine' Looks Oh So Familiar »
Friday
11Jul2008

Sherlock Holmes: Paging Dr. Watson

Confirmation came earlier this week that Robert Downey Jr. will play Sherlock Holmes in a long-overdue rebirth of the famous detective. With Guy Ritchie at the helm as director, I can only imagine that it will be quite a bit different from the Sherlock Holmes of Arthur Conan Doyle's novels. We had heard when all this talk started that we'll see a little more physicality out of Holmes in the new version, more a physical hero than an intellectual one.

All of this raises a few questions: Will they keep it in Victorian England at all? After all, Holmes is fictional. Will the cases be new or will it come from some of his many previously published adventures? Will it be more of a Guy Ritchie film than a Sherlock Holmes film? And who will play Dr. Watson?

John Watson was Holmes' biographer, confidante, and roommate. In a certain light, since he's a first person narrator, the books are as much about Watson as they are about Holmes; Watson's the one who shows emotion and charts our course. He's the archetypal sidekick, and he's a necessary component to any Holmes story.

So we know Downey and Ritchie are on board, but that still leaves a big void in my opinion. You can't just throw any old pasty English guy with a broad moustache in the role, because Watson is there every step of the way. Therefore, casting the right Watson is no small matter.

I have a few suggestions, and I've even ranked them in terms of my preference. Allow me to say, strictly for the purposes of beating you to the pun(ch), finding a new Dr. Watson is anything but elementary.

 

giamatti_w.jpg1 - Paul Giamatti

Like Holmes and Watson, Downey and Giamatti are roughly the same age. Clearly, it doesn't matter that we have an American Holmes, so an American Watson shouldn't be a big deal, either.

Also, I think he can play off Downey very well - both are incredibly bright, distinctive actors who have a tremendous natural sense of humor in their performances - and he could play the part whether it takes place in the 19th Century or the 21st.

Unfortunately for the rest of the guys on this list, Giamatti was the first actor who popped into my head. It'll be very hard for me to think someone else might be a better fit.

 

broadbent_w.jpg2 - Jim Broadbent

Older, yes, and British, but what I love about this choice is what a natural supporting actor Broadbent is. He almost never takes a direct hit of cinematic sunlight; he's always in someone else's background.

That's not to say he's not a capable actor. I mean, watch just about anything he's ever done. He's just a very solid choice to support a dominant personality in a film, and you know what you'll get with him every time.

Works very well if they keep this film in the Victorian Era, too.

 

izzard_w.jpg3 - Eddie Izzard

Think of it: Two guys who have played Charlie Chaplin in films - both of them quite well - joining forces as Holmes and Watson.

Izzard is as good an actor as he is a stand-up comedian (and I once saw him perform live for well over two hours), and he brings an assured intelligence to the role of Watson, maybe a tad more intelligence than the character himself ever gets.

More a fanciful pick than the other two, but it would be great to see.

 

ejiofor_w.jpg4 - Chiwetel Ejiofor

If they're thinking outside the box, and I believe casting Robert Downey Jr. and hiring Guy Ritchie for a Sherlock Holmes movie is definitely outside the box, then who better than Ejiofor? He's a brilliant actor, needs more press, and he can absolutely hold his own with Downey. In fact, if we think Downey's a better actor, it's only because we've seen more of his performances. This guy is the truth.

If they bring the story forward a bit chronologically, what in the world would be wrong with a black Watson? I think it has about as much chance of happening as selling this house I bought last year for a significant profit sometime in the next few months, but when you have two characters as closely aligned as Holmes and Watson, why not cast accordingly? They'd make a great team.

 

gleeson_w.jpg5 - Brendan Gleeson

You don't look at Brendan Gleeson and see the whole story, which is strange because when you look at Brendan Gleeson you see a hulk of a man with tons of mileage. Holmes and Watson met after Watson's medical discharge from military service, and I can see those kinds of echoes in Gleeson's eyes.

He's been an extremely versatile actor - love him in Potter, Dark Blue, and In Bruges over the past few years - and physically, I think he's probably the best choice if they're sticking to the story somewhat.

And, because Holmes is the star and Watson is more the bedrock, Gleeson can fill the role the same way Broadbent can, effectively and without marching on Robert Downey's spotlight.

 

rickman_w.jpg6 - Alan Rickman

For almost any other role in the world, Alan Rickman would be much, much higher on the list. The only reason I have him here is because he simply can't escape being too hip for the room. He's always above the fray, with snide remarks and uncontrollable sarcasm. That's why I love his work.

However, that's not what John Watson's all about. And I think there's a tendency with Rickman to be a little more dominant when he's on screen than this character allows for.

I'd love to see the screen test, don't get me wrong - and who knows, maybe Watson's personality will be changed in the story along with so many other things - but Rickman would be a real dark horse.

 

nighy_w.jpg7 - Bill Nighy

Old (but three years younger than Rickman and Broadbent), distinguished, wry, subtle...in a way, that's Dr. Watson. But like a few other candidates, he's not physically the best match. He'd probably make a better Holmes, when you think about it.

I actually just like nominating Bill Nighy for any part that comes up. Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland: Bill Nighy. Captain America: Bill Nighy. It's fun to pretend.

What I do like about him as a possible choice, though, is his ability to do a lot without saying very much. He's one of the best bemused, quiet actors working today.

 

winstone_w.jpg8 - Ray Winstone

He'd be a good choice if Brendan Gleeson weren't here already. The only real reason I have Winstone on the list - aside from the fact that, like all the others, he could pull it off - is that I like his muscle, his oomph. If they're going more physical with Holmes, maybe they'll go more physical with Watson, too.

I realize Winstone's a little rough around the edges, a lot more than we'd ever consider Watson to be, but he fits well with Guy Ritchie directing, and he's got an enormous personality that could play well off the fastidious nature of Sherlock Holmes.

It could introduce an even more pronounced Odd Couple vibe to the whole thing.

 

Now, having gone through all that, I suspect I'll be proven very, very wrong. But I'm open to suggestions; see if you can pick who it will be, either from our list or your own.

Reader Comments (2)

My vote is Giamiatti! I wouldn't mind seeing either Izzard, Gleeson or Rickman though!

Friday, July 11, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterRyan

good calls. I'd like to see Rickman as a Moriarty type villain, though. It is as hard to cast Watson as Holmes because both were extentions of Sir Arthur Conan-Doyle and both characters exhibit traits from his personality, knowledge and interests.

Friday, July 18, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterthe bull

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>