website tracking

Search The Big Picture

« Movie Review - 'The Women' | Main | Movie Review - 'Righteous Kill' »
Friday
12Sep2008

Movie Review - 'Burn After Reading'

Burn After Reading

Starring George Clooney, Brad Pitt, and John Malkovich
Directed by Joel Coen and Ethan Coen
Rated R


burn_after_reading/burnafterreading_galleryposter2.jpg Despite their overdue acceptance speeches at this year’s Academy Awards for No Country for Old Men, Joel and Ethan Coen don’t really make moralistic contemporary Westerns and they sure don’t co-opt another writer’s dialogue. Instead, the brothers have carved out their niche over the past two decades by telling peculiar stories punctuated with an identifiable brand of absurdity.

Not to take anything away from their Best Picture winner, but No Country is atypical of their other great work, like Fargo, The Big Lebowski, and O Brother Where Art Thou. Though Anton Chigurh is definitely strange, for example, he’s not an oddball in the mold of H.I. McDonough from Raising Arizona.

Therefore, Burn After Reading might seem downright light and amusing by comparison to No Country, but it features more of those idiosyncrasies we’ve come to expect from the Coens over the years. There are a lot of structural similarities to Fargo in particular, which can never be a bad thing. Surprisingly, given the multiple storylines converging here, watching Burn After Reading doesn’t require a lot of effort, because the events unfold so cleanly and directly.

After Osbourne Cox (John Malkovich) is demoted by the CIA, he quits in favor of writing his memoirs, which he vows will be explosive. But the memoirs fall into the wrong hands, namely those of health club employees Chad (Brad Pitt) and Linda (Frances McDormand). Immediately, Chad and Linda decide to blackmail Cox because they think he’s pretty high up in the intelligence community. Meanwhile, a self-absorbed sex addict Linda has met online (George Clooney) is also seeing Cox’s cold, manipulative wife (Tilda Swinton). It’s a tangled web.

The Coens have written this script in such a way that the big stars, arguably the most recognizable cast they’ve ever had, are their own distinct points on the map - Malkovich shares one scene with Clooney and two with Pitt, one of those on the phone, while Swinton never interacts with anyone but Malkovich and Clooney. Lesser filmmakers might want to connect these stories even more, but the Coens do exactly what is required to propel their story and nothing more.

It’s interesting to watch Burn After Reading and wonder what came first in the process. Was it the missing CIA memoirs? Was it the idiots blackmailing someone they shouldn’t? If the blackmail came first, what came last? The sex addict?

This is without a doubt a showcase for the lead actors, with Pitt in particular giving an oblivious, gung ho performance, but some of the film’s best moments are reserved for Richard Jenkins and J.K. Simmons, two of the finest supporting players around. Jenkins has been wonderful in dramatic work (check out his nomination-worthy effort in this year’s The Visitor) and in comedy (Step Brothers), and as the health club manager quietly pining over Linda, he’s really the only substantive human being in Burn After Reading.

Simmons is best known for his blustery J. Jonah Jameson in the Spider-Man blockbusters and he plays a brusque CIA hard ass here, supplying some of the film’s biggest laughs in a very small space.

Is this "idiot comedy" a likely Oscar contender? No, not really. Carter Burwell’s ominous musical score is quite nice, so maybe there’s hope on that front, but Burn After Reading feels more like a calibration of the instruments for the Coen Brothers, just to see if the old instincts still work. And do they ever.

Reader Comments (5)

Nice.

It's not out in my territory yet, so I can't add anything useful.

I did react a bit to the statement that No Country was a bird apart from the Coens' other films. I don't quite agree. To me it has many of the best components from their catalogue, except one: laughter. It's funny in its way - but unless you're on medication, you shouldn't be laughing all the way through it.

Perhaps they saved the laughter for Burn After Reading? I hope so.

Friday, September 12, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterLengthy Johnson

If you didn't know any better, you wouldn't watch No Brother and think it has a real Coen aesthetic. But I think if you watch Burn After Reading, even without knowing who made it, you'd lump it in with Fargo and O Brother.

Friday, September 12, 2008 | Registered CommenterColin Boyd

The Man Who Wasn't There is also a different.

As was Barton Fink.

Their overall tone are not too different from No Country for Old Men.

One clear similarity between those those 3 films is endings, which to some are abrupt and enigmatic, while others find them perfectly symmetrical.

Friday, September 12, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterLengthy Johnson

i've never not liked a coen film, except for 'blood simple'.

this one was great fun, all the way through... with some excellent GASP! moments....

Saturday, September 27, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterquin browne

I am impressed by this review. I have been dealing with so many people who are so ready to dismiss this film as the second Lady Killers. But for the life of me I can't see what the problem is. The film has zany characters who could have easily delved into cliche charicature status, but they manage to all be very fresh and strangely likable. The plot, as you mentioned, could have been convoluted and impossible to follow, but instead there is never a moment where I feel lost. And if the film isn't always funny, it makes up for it by being funnier than expected at parts where it could have gotten away with a simple chuckle.

The Coen brothers make good flicks. Sorry critics, but it's just the case. Knock off the sour grapes and let yourself enjoy the show.

Monday, September 29, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterThe Daily Kirk

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>