website tracking
Search the Big Picture

       



First Alice in Wonderland Images

Transformers Movie Review

 Eight Clips from The Hangover

 Goldblum Spoofs Obama's Fly Swatting

Dark Knight Advertising Win Awards

First Footage Screened for Cameron's Avatar

 The Hangover Review

Best Picture Nominees Now Doubled

Great Trailer for Inglourious Basterds?

Branagh's Thor One-Man Show for Marvel


« Cruise to Voice 'Shrek' Villain? | Main | Gerard Butler Can Count To '300'...But Only Once »
Friday
05Sep

Movie Review - 'Bangkok Dangerous'

DateFriday, September 5, 2008 at 2:44PM
Bangkok Dangerous

Starring Nicolas Cage and Shahkrit Yamnarm
Directed by Danny and Oxide Pang
Rated R


bangkokdangerous_galleryposter2.jpg You hear all the time that sex and violence in movies and television has desensitized our society, and dangerously so. We're warned about letting our children play Grand Theft Auto, meanwhile their grandparents sang along as Johnny Cash shot a man in Reno just to watch him die. Sorry, but I don't see much difference.

Sex and violence is around us all the time and it always has been, intertwined in a way that it probably shouldn't be. Of course, Jack the Ripper never downloaded porn or watched a slasher movie, so what set him off?

On the surface, Bangkok Dangerous brings to mind those images of sex and violence, not separate but rushing together. Bangkok, as you probably know, has one of the world's most liberal sex trades - you want it, you got it. Dangerous, at least when the movie poster shows Nicolas Cage pointing a gun, means violence. Strangely enough, though, this movie didn't have enough of either, or at least not enough of one or the other.

Cage plays a hitman named Joe, who, as movie hitmen do, moves from city to city killing high profile targets for untold riches. He lives very well, again, as movie hitmen almost always do. He's called to Bangkok to eliminate four targets and Joe considers in the last job. There's a reason crime movies employ the last job device so frequently: It's an instant character arc. If the criminal gets out of that life, he's reformed, and the screenwriter has therefore done the minimum amount required by the story.

Joe tells us the rules of being an effective hitman (although you'd think by blabbing about it, he'd be less effective): 1) Don't ask questions 2) Don't get attached 3) Erase all traces 4) Know when to get out. I wonder, if a hitman is in a house on fire, as Cage is at one point in Bangkok Dangerous, does he go through his checklist before stop, drop, and roll, or would that practical advice trump his rules of engagement? You have to admit, seven steps is a lot to remember. Maybe that's why he makes so much money.

The problem with Bangkok Dangerous is that it doesn't just want to be a hitman movie, and it doesn't want to trade in just sex and violence. But it's a violent world we're watching that just so happens to be on assignment in the sex capital of the world. That's what we should be seeing, frankly. Instead, directors Danny and Oxide Pang want this remake of their own 1999 film to incorporate the teacher-student storyline and the lovers in a dangerous time storyline.

Perhaps this film would've been fine with one of those, but it snaps under the weight of both.

On a final note, I don't understand the way movie studios choose which films they don't want critics to see. Let's keep the argument just about Nic Cage for a minute. In 2006, I struggled through the press screening of Wicker Man, which was among that year's worst films. Anyone could see how awful it was. Last year, I had to see Next on opening day because there was no early screening for that. The movie wasn't great, but it certainly was no disaster. It had some good qualities, at least. This year, Bangkok Dangerous has tried to avoid the scornful gaze of critics. It's misguided, as I pointed out, and it's not terribly polished, but it is not overpoweringly bad. Go figure.

AuthorColin Boyd | | in , , , | Print ArticlePrint Article | | Comment6 Comments

Reader Comments (6)

...there is NO gun on a poster...
~pep

Friday, September 5, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterpepe

Yes there is. It's in his hand. A revolver. Tough to see, but it's there. Also: Bullet holes.

Friday, September 5, 2008 | Registered CommenterColin Boyd

http://www.impawards.com/2008/bangkok_dangerous_ver2_xlg.html

:)

Saturday, September 6, 2008 | Unregistered Commenteryasmin

Well I'll be damned. Sure looks like he's holding a gun. He ought to be; people are shooting at him.

Saturday, September 6, 2008 | Registered CommenterColin Boyd

Fuc..
Bangkok is not the sex capital of the world. But L A is

Monday, September 8, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterBank

The movie wasn't all bad. Cage delivered a decent performance. Not his best, but not the worst. Yamnarm was impressive with his performance as a pickpocket turned student as well. The lines were simple and the plot uncomplex. It was very slow between action segments. Action sequences were kept to small, spread out segments. The biggest disappointment: the ending. I'm satisfied with the experience for the most part, like I said, not a bad movie. It was better than I thought it would be.

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterCici

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>