Friday
02Jan2009
'Slumdog' Remixed
Friday, January 2, 2009 at 11:22AM
By now, I hope I've convinced you to see Slumdog Millionaire. It's my role as a critic to tell you what I think of the movies, good or bad, and based on your own impressions and what you've read from me and other reviewers you like or dislike, make up your own mind about whether or not to see a film. If I say it's awful and you generally agree with me, you might skip it. If I say it's the best movie of the year, you might be more inclined to see it.

Slumdog is a classic example of the exception proving the rule. I hear and read quite often that nobody listens to movie critics and that they serve no purpose to an average moviegoer. Then explain to me how a movie about a slum kid half a world away has made $20 million in six weeks in America while never making it to more than 700 theaters.
This movie is completely driven by positive word of mouth, which began at film festivals this fall and picked up speed when critics got a chance to see it later in the year. There is not a huge Dev Patel contingent in the United States, and there's likely (and sadly) not even a big enough crowd that will see a Danny Boyle movie just because he directed it.
So, for me and for other critics who have praised this film and some of the year's other fantastic offerings that don't make the talk show circuit or have commercials on in every prime time show, the success of Slumdog Millionaire is a little victory in a game where less than half the films are worth recommending in ther first place.
Here's a new Slumdog remix, kind of mash up of scenes from the movie, that might pique your interest if you're still looking for a reason to check it out.
Trailer courtesy of Trailer Addict
If you're in the U.K., that January 9th release date is for you. Otherwise, check your local listings because, unlike The Day the Earth Stood Still, this one isn't in every city in America.

Colin Boyd |
Permalink | in
Danny Boyle,
Slumdog Millionaire,
Video |
Print Article |
Email Article |
6 Comments |











Reader Comments (6)
I really don't get the euphoria about this movie.
That was awesome. I've already seen this movie, and I completely loved it. I love Danny Boyle. He's always doing different things, and they're always amazing. It's so sad to me that a lot of people don't recognize his name 'cause he's definitely one of the best directors out there.
I think you liked this movie because it has the song 'paper planes' in it...two versions at that...:)
I saw it yesterday and really liked it. Thanks for the insight...
That's rather grandiose. Few movies set in Mumbai have as few viewers as this one (domestic $20M means one million viewers, two tops?). Films set in Mumbai have plenty of built-in interest around the world; for you to take credit for stoking it is like praising the power of your positive review of a sunrise.
Hasrat -
That's a very cute last line, although you missed the point entirely, and you might want to check your Bollywood math, too. Slumdog has not been in wide release or anything close to it in the U.S., and yet, it's already made $24 million, a figure that should nearly double by the time the Oscar nominations are announced in three weeks. If recent Fox Searchlight Oscar movies are any indication, the domestic total for this film should be $80 million minimum, maybe as high as $125 million.
That's in the U.S. alone. It won't open in most international markets for several more weeks or months, including India. So your point about built-in interest around the world means nothing, because it's only playing in the U.S., Australia, Puerto Rico, and Italy. And the only reason it's getting a huge push in other countries in 2009 is because of the response it's getting here in America. I think by the time the global accounting is done, this could be a quarter-billion movie, and no film set in Mumbai has ever come close to that amount. In fact, nothing's come within about $200 million of that amount. According to Box Office India, the highest-grossing Indian film has only made the equivalent of $33 million US, and that's the adjusted total.
But considering that the film was almost relegated to a DVD-only release because the original studio that owned it went belly-up and critical response at film festivals in Toronto and Telluride helped keep it alive, and that it has no bankable stars nor a bankable director at a time when Hollywood is trotting out its entire arsenal of both, yes, I do think critics and journalists had a lot to do with getting the word out about this film.
It's getting press for the right reasons, it's winning awards, and that's what's translating into returns at the box office.
"I do think critics and journalists had a lot to do with getting the word out about this film."
I absolutely agree with your above sentence in response to the previous ignorant poster. This little movie has become such a surprising hit only by great critical reviews and word of mouth. Great movie btw, totally enjoyed it!