"Under six feet with dark hair." Okay... how about Gary Coleman then?

Seriously though, Raimi needs to move on. I am worried about writing a script around something that sounds "really cool!"

Nah man, Morbius is too lame to be in the next film. What they should do to make money is have Spider-Man face Edward Cullen for a "Twilight" crossover- and there you go, instant $400 million Domestic Box Office.

I always felt that what they should do if they want more than one villain in the movie is to just start the movie off with something like Electro robbing a bank, and Spidey foiling it all during the first 10-15 minutes of the movie. That way, they get to use some of the more thug-type villains without them henching for a mastermind. Plus, it sets up their existence in case they wanted to do the Sinister Six at some point.

The Lizard idea would've been excellent for Spiderman 3 and a more solid choice than how Venom was brought about. I wasn't particularly fond of the sad sack Sandman turned out to be and frankly making villains pitiable generally kills good vs. bad flicks for me. Even going forward, Lizard makes a solid choice and despite his age I think TM will maintain his boyish looks enough that no one will notice. Now if he pulls a pot-belly, double-chin and starts balding... well the role goes to Elijah Wood I guess.

Whatever they do I hope it comes with Spidey taking a good beating. The third film had a bit of that but it was hard to get into fully because of the way certain scenes were written. The Sinister 6 angle would be cool but no... there's no way in hell it could be pulled off especially since having Venom, Sandman and Goblin jr. proved too much to juggle. Maybe they can get someone to do Mysterio! I've always liked ol' fishbowl head because he came off part Dr. Doom and Dr. Strange in one.. and the fishbowl just cracked me up.