website tracking
Search The Big Picture
« Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. : "I Have a DreamWorks" | Main | 'Thor' Takes a Villain: Marvel Casts Loki »
Monday
18May2009

Watch the First 'Sherlock Holmes' Trailer

Hey, the new Sherlock Holmes trailer has been released and...at least I'll get to see Rachel McAdams in a corset. Otherwise...I'm terribly unsure.

I'll leave it to you to give this one a thumbs up or down. You know the drill by now: Robert Downey is Holmes, Jude Law is Watson, and Guy Ritchie is pouring some Amp Energy down the gullet of one of literature's most enduring characters.

The trailer is kind of what I expected - action, action, action, plus a little comedy - but really? A shot in the balls? I digress...

Sherlock Holmes will be in theaters on Christmas.

Reader Comments (10)

I'm not going to say that it's a great trailer but it is a smart trailer... playing to an action-flick audience instead of using a more 'intellectual' Holmes as a selling point (not sure if the intellectual Holmes is in the movie at all though, we'll see, but you probably wouldn't cash in on a trailer based on one).

Monday, May 18, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterAnybody

At least we get to wait until we celebrate Jesus' birth to see Holmes and Watson make out...

Tuesday, May 19, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterWill

So I take it they never actually read one of the books? They just heard about the names and job descriptions, maybe a bit about when and where it was set, then proceeded to paint the same Hollywood picture with that pallet?

I do like a good corset though. ;)

Tuesday, May 19, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterNIronwolf

Yeah, I really don't get it. It's not like the Holmes stories need a lot of help. I mean, he's one of the most read fictional characters in English literature. I don't see what good can come from turning him into Austin Powers.

Tuesday, May 19, 2009 | Registered CommenterColin Boyd

[quote]So I take it they never actually read one of the books? They just heard about the names and job descriptions, maybe a bit about when and where it was set, then proceeded to paint the same Hollywood picture with that pallet?

I do like a good corset though. ;)[/quote]

[quote]Yeah, I really don't get it. It's not like the Holmes stories need a lot of help. I mean, he's one of the most read fictional characters in English literature. I don't see what good can come from turning him into Austin Powers.[/quote]

Interesting.

When its Sherlock Homes its ok to not understand why the director would go about gutting the essence of the main characters and completely abandoning what made the original stories resonate.

But when its Star Trek......

Tuesday, May 19, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterkUPD's Smartest Listener

I'll prbably see this but it looks like the crew didn't really decide if it should be a serious movie or a comedy, much like Romeo + Juliet. Bad trailer though, I hope the second one is longer and a bit more calm.

Tuesday, May 19, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterThe Spam Master

Here's the difference: Nobody gutted "the essence of the main characters" in Star Trek. In fact, Bones McCoy is pretty close to an impression. Sure, Chekhov couldn't be there. So should they just wait ten years to bring that character into the movie? There's no way you could watch the characterizations in Star Trek and not know who's who.

If they had turned Kirk into a bookish virgin, that would approximate what they're doing to Sherlock Holmes, or more accurately, handcuffing Spock to a bed, like they do Holmes in this trailer. You give me the equivalent of that in Star Trek. It's the difference between re-imagining and totally discarding the character traits.

Tuesday, May 19, 2009 | Registered CommenterColin Boyd

I will do that Colin when I see it. However at this point I have little confidence that anything I bring up will be both received, and discounted, as meaningless fan-boi nit picking.

Wednesday, May 20, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterKUPD's Smartest Listener

Sherlock Holmes has been done in so many different ways that I'm not really offended by this.

It looks like an antertaining movie with good cinematography, so why the long faces?

Friday, May 22, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterLengthy Johnson

I agree not everything has to be an action film or has to have sophomoric humor. It is not like we don't support intelligent moves. Holmes is awesome and this does not look so. Also, Why can't we find one of the excellent British actors to play a British role? Colin Firth? Anyone. Why do we insist on making Americans play foreigners? Like why couldn't we find a Greek actor to play Leonides or at least on person in 300 etc?

Tuesday, May 26, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterJIm

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>