website tracking
Search The Big Picture
« Another Gyllenhaal Shot from 'Prince of Persia' | Main | Who Should Play Bilbo Baggins in 'The Hobbit'? »
Friday
17Jul2009

Russell Crowe Wants More 'Master and Commander'

In a discussion of recent underrated films go - and granted, my definition of recent may differ from yours - I would still bring up Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World. I might be the only person who believes a movie that earned ten Oscar nominations and over $200 million around the world is underrated, I realize, but honestly, did you know it made that much and was so heavily nominated?

Russell Crowe wants another Master and Commander movie, and in theory, I'm all for it. Crowe tells the AP (via USA Today) "there's still a long way to go" in adapting the Patrick O'Brian book The Reverse of the Medal into a film. O'Brian wrote over 20 novels based on Crowe's character, Capt. Jack Aubrey and Paul Bettany's low-key doctor, Stephen Maturin. At issue is acquiring the film rights to the novel.

Now, I said that in theory I support this. A lot of it depends on who else is involved. Peter Weir knows a thing or two about directing movies, and while you don't need Weir, Crowe shouldn't settle for much of a step down.

The best thing about Far Side in my opinion was the direction and the battle sequences. If they secure enough financing (although, let's be honest, the sequel can't cost $150 million like the first one), Crowe can attract a good director. That's key.

The screenplay also concerns me, because of Crowe's recent admission that he tried to develop a Gladiator sequel in which Maximus would be brought back to life and rewarded with immortality, working his way through the great battles of history and eventually landing a job in the Pentagon. Yeah. Let's hope he keeps his Master and Commander sequel closer to the book.

The character is good enough, but what always stood out about the books in the series I read (only a couple, both after the movie) was O'Brian's attention to detail. There's enough in these stories to make a good movie, as proven by the first one, but can Crowe get the director and the funds to ensure his follow-up is also worth it?

Reader Comments (13)

Agreed, but it's a shame that Hollywood snobbery will prevent O'Brian's books finding their more natural adapted home - on television. There is an obvious, pre-existing model on this side of the Atlantic: the Sharpe series, starring Sean Bean (arguably his best, and most convincing role - an opinion shared by the books' author). Crowe seemed very much at home in the part of Aubrey, and the books would work well as a property suited to the televisual medium. For another example of similar success, look to the Hornblower series...

Friday, July 17, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterSensaes

Jack Aubrey is actually Russel Crowe's best role so far because he displays three sides of the character very well. The iron will in leading his men, his friendly hand with the officers and the fearlessness in battle. If only all officers were like that in real life.

I don't know what Crowe's creative involvement was in the first film but he should clearly restrict himself to acting.

Also, it would not work to repeat the formula of the first film. People would be bored to death with anouther ship-bound film. There would have to be a lot more scenes on land.

Saturday, July 18, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterLengthy Johnson

". For another example of similar success, look to the Hornblower series..."

For the love of god please don't! That dreadful series actually put me off the books for years because of how they simplified Hornblower down to a perfect, confident, flawless hero.

Saturday, July 18, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterMax

master and commander is my favorite movie of all time

Saturday, July 18, 2009 | Unregistered Commentersteve

A sequel would be brilliant! I loved the first movie, great plot (the Acheron was awesome), great acting- everything was just so well done, and I appreciated the attention to detail. The music was fantastic too!
So yeah, bring on the sequel. : ) (hopefully Peter Weir will direct it...)

Sunday, July 19, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterEliza

I also think a sequel is warranted: and not just because the movie made a profit, but because it was one of the most excellent sea adventures ever. And -- are you paying attention Lengthy Johnson? -- half or more of the film _should_ be set aboard ship. The books are about a Sea Captain -- not a land lubber.

Friday, July 24, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDTS

DTS, read the books! The complexity of Jack Aubrey's character is all in who he is on land. The beauty of O'Brien's writing is that Jack is in his element on the quarter deck, but he is a mess (poor, unfaithful to his marriage). The same is true for the doctor, I really hope the movie is not constricted to the 300 feet that is the Surprise. BTW I love the books and the movie for its depiction of Surface Actions.

Thursday, August 20, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterChris

I certainly hope this really happens, minus any crowe tomfoolery. there isnt enough good historical fiction made in the war genre.

Thursday, August 27, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterRob

This was a great movie,everything was as accurate as one could expect in a movie.Just one thing
the final battle Jack would have hammered , the french once he crippled it ,not risked the lives of
his crew but that would have not made a very movie like end

Tuesday, September 1, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterdave f

I've read Patrick O'Brian's Jack Aubrey series over and over again. I thought Russell and Paul did a fantastic job with the characters, and I thought the direction and cinamatography were equally brilliant. I would love to see a sequel to Master and Commander. I wish it were "Letter of Marque" wherein Jack Aubrey is busted out of the navy and becomes a privateer. Russell would be sooo sexy in the part. However, I will settle for "Reverse of the Medal." Please, please make the movie RC.

Saturday, September 19, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterBluesconnect

I'm currently half way through the series on 'The Far Side of the World' and love every minute of it. It's been easy to see that they've taken little bits out of all the books I've read so far, and the main story of The Far Side of the World for the film. I think if they did a sequel, which I really hope they do, then it would obviously need dashing naval action again, but it would be good to have more on land, and show some of Stephen's intelligence-based activities. It would be a real treat for the readers to hear and see some of the old names from the books, like Henneage Dundas etc. I wonder if they'd show us what happened at the end of the last film, if Surprise caught up with Acheron in time! : S

Thursday, September 24, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterEd A

Bring back "Lucky Jack".
"Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World" is as bracing a film as any ever made. Russell Crowe absolutely helms his characterization with the appropriate amount of pathos and authority. Few and far between are gems such as this movie. Descriptions and hyperbole fall way short of the mark in praising this modern classic.

Monday, September 28, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterNostromo

I agree wholeheartedly that it's time for the sequel. The first one is by far may favorite movie. The soundtrack is also wonderful.

Friday, October 2, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterKristaO

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>