Thursday
Jan142010
Thursday, January 14, 2010 at 10:42PM Movie Review - 'The Lovely Bones'
| The Lovely Bones
Starring Saoirse Ronan, Mark Wahlberg, Rachel Weisz, and Stanly Tucci ![]() |
The Lovely Bones is a grand, grandiose failure. Peter Jackson has taken the popular bestseller by Alice Sebold, dressed it up in a dreamscape, and presents it as one
very pretty but emotionally empty package.
Where did it go wrong? It's hard to pinpoint one thing specifically. Rather, it's more accurate (but admittedly no
more satisfying) to say that very few elements of the production stick with you in a good way, and many of them, from performances to the music, have
no impact at all.
There is also the very real consideration that sometimes movies just don't work as well as their parts. This is the
second time in a month that a prohibitive awards favorite has sunk on screen. Nine assembled the best cast of
the year, had strong source material, a director that knows the ropes of the musical genre, and outside of 15 - 20
minutes, the film is curiously catatonic.
It is worse in this case because those 15 minutes are even harder to spot. The Lovely Bones finds no benefit
from Jackson's direction, which history might one day define as overwrought. There's very little advantage gained by
having Rachel Weisz and Susan Sarandon in the cast,
leaving most of the work on the shoulders of Mark Wahlberg, Stanley
Tucci, and young Saoirse Ronan.
It's no mystery what happens in The Lovely Bones, and if you've so much as seen a commercial for the film,
you know the score. However, it's hard to analyze the film without going into some detail about the plot, so
consider this your spoiler alert. From beyond the grave, Susie Salmon (Ronan) tells us the story of her murder, her
killer, and her family, ripped apart by her disappearance and death, and the lack of closure that would come from
finding the responsible party.




Reader Comments (5)
I'm still very much interested in this film, but I keep hearing that it's hard to say what exactly is so wrong with this movie. I guess it just fails to make a lasting impression on the audience, which is a damn shame, considering the pedigree on display here.
One good thing (at least for me) that might come from this, even though only Sunday will truly tell how this will play out, is that if this movie is DOA, the only real push will be for Stanley Tucci as Best Supporting Actor, and if I remember correctly, he was one of the frontrunners. If he's the good thing in a bad film, it's less likely that he'll be recognized for his work. Which gives me hope that Cristoph Waltz will take home that bald, golden statue come a few months from now.
i bought this book the day it was released... they'd just unpacked it and i thought it sounded wonderful... and it was. (sadly, her other book of fiction sucked rocks)
i've waited for this, wondering where they'd go with it... i won't watch it until it's out on hbo.
*sad little sigh*
I didn't really care for the book all that much (man, that ending.... wow) so I was on the fence about whether or not to see this but it hasn't been getting very good reviews so far. It seems like Peter Jackson may have peaked w/ the LOTR trilogy, since King Kong was another overdone movie that was a whole lot of nothing.
And I'll admit it; I can't watch a movie w/ Mark Whalberg anymore without thinking of him talking to a goat. Doesn't matter how serious or tense the situation is on screen I'll still be stifling laughter.
Well, I think Ryan Gosling would have been worse - I don't know how old he is but the father of a 14 year old? I don't think so. I thought this was a deeply sad but touching book - it should have had the tone of Mystic River and Gone baby Gone.
I felt like I was hit with a tranquilizer dart while watching this film.
Peter Jackson missed the mark big time. The whole thing felt like it was in
slow motion. No suspence. I agree with this review in that way too much time
was spent in the limbo world of the girl. Truly a disappointment .