Friday
May142010
Friday, May 14, 2010 at 3:29AM Movie Review - 'Robin Hood'
| Robin Hood
Starring Russell Crowe and Cate Blanchett ![]() |
Sometimes, it's easier to see when a movie goes south than where. For Robin Hood, it was almost a pre-determined
verdict: This film isn't the one that was originally pitched, the female lead was replaced by a completely different type of performer
and, at one point, the production was delayed so the foliage would be in bloom.
And so, the end result, the movie we see, just never hits its stride. It would be tough to know why that happens without that bit of
production history. This one went south before it ever started.
In fairness, there are admirable qualities about Robin Hood, and the best analogy I can think of is walking through a model home
and taking note of all the great amenities, but no matter what room you walk into, you always hear the walls creak. This isn't a bad
movie, simply an undercooked, mediocre one, which, when you consider all it should have going for it, actually makes it seem worse.
The story needs no introduction, except maybe to writer Brian Helgeland. The actors - Russell Crowe, Cate Blanchett, Max Von Sydow, William
Hurt - all bring with them a reassuring presence for the audience. Familiar faces if not familiar names
Mark Strong and Danny
Huston do the voodoo they do so well. You can argue that Blanchett, if not miscast, is certainly under-
utilized. She's a force of nature relegated to a supporting female role that only ocassionally does lip service to her stature as one of
the five or ten greatest and most versatile film actors alive.
Crowe, regrettably, falls into what he has done so well over the years, simply whipping a film into subservience. Honestly, go back and
watch The Insider and L.A. Confidential, when Crowe was Brando and Burton rolled into one. The process of creating
characters seems to be less important to him or, I hope, to the films. He's just not that interesting here, though he's certainly
willful, and great actors have the ability to rise above their script, finding ways to liven it up. There is no nuance here like you'll
find in Master and Commander; it's not as much a performance as it is a role.




Reader Comments (7)
This is really disappointing to read. I thought this would be a good movie. Maybe they should have done it from the Sheriff of Nottingham's view like was rumored last year. Universal most likely will have another failure on their hands now.
Lethargic bloated a swing and a miss a true dissapointment I was also shocked that Brian Helgeland wrote the screenplay he is usually more reliable. Sometimes you just miss, of course going in I was expecting the Robin Hood movie like all other Robin Hood Movies At least they tried to inject some originality in the same story told over and over again. Could've been really good instead it just drags, there should've been a rewrite or something.
tiffany1837jewelry
tiffany1837co
tiffany jewellery
tiffany1837online
t925silvertiffany
iloveyou925
Another historical fantacy done poorly. Too bad with all the money spent producing this film, they couldn't hire a historian to stear them in a general right direction. By the end of the movie I was drained, not from suspence but from forcing myself to stay awake. My eleven and Fourteen year old girls liked it, but anyone with a full highschool education would find it a waist of time and good money.
Robin Hood is steeling from eveyone and giving to himself.
I liked the posts and cool layout you have here! I would like to thank you for sharing your experience and the time it took to post!! Two Thumbs up!
Really your post is really very good and I appreciate it. It’s hard to sort the good from the bad sometimes, but I think you’ve nailed it. You write very well which is amazing. I really impressed by your post.
Great post I must say. Simple but yet entertaining and engaging... Keep up the good work!