<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.8.0 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:45:33 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Get The Big Picture</title><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.8.0 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Stephen Frears Reteaming with 'High Fidelity' Writer</title><category>Adaptations</category><category>Stephen Frears</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:02:08 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2009/11/7/stephen-frears-reteaming-with-high-fidelity-writer.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:5728100</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana"><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0146882/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>High Fidelity</i></font></a><font face="Verdana"> should have done better at the box office a million years ago. It did OK considering - $27 million plus about another $20 million internationally, but I think Disney was probably the wrong place to distribute it, and it probably never made a big impression on a lot of people until it hit the home video market. 
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/pics/09/frears02.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana"> 
One of the things the film shows is the versatility of director <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001241/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Stephen Frears</font></a><font face="Verdana"> (<i>The Queen</i>). It doesn't hurt that they had a fantastic Nick Hornby novel to work from, and now, a decade later, Frears and <i>High Fidelity</i> screenwriter <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0222584/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">D.V. DeVincentis</font></a><font face="Verdana"> might reunite to tackle "a dramedy set in the world of geeky gamblers," according to <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i748142eb75e0799f3c1a715fc0b5ef71" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>The Hollywood Reporter</i></font></a><font face="Verdana">. The project is an adaptation of the upcoming memoir <i>Lay the Favorite, Take the Dog</i> by Beth Raymer, which is basically <i>21</i> with middle-age guys.
</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-5728100.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>J.J. Abrams In Talks to Produce 'Micronauts' Movie</title><category>J.J. Abrams</category><category>Toys</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:45:39 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2009/11/7/jj-abrams-in-talks-to-produce-micronauts-movie.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:5728067</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana">Should this news turn out to be true and a movie version of <i>Micronauts</i> happens, I'm pretty glad <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0009190/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">J.J. Abrams</font></a><font face="Verdana"> would be involved. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125737028160428961.html" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>The Wall Street Journal</i></font></a><font face="Verdana"> says Abrams is in talks to produce a film based on the old Japanese interchangable toys - a precursor to <i>Tranformers, Go-Bots</i>, and Alexis Arquette.
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/pics/09/micronauts.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana"> 
Hasbro recently acquired the property, and we know that Hasbro has put itself on the forefront of this whole toys n' games movie tie-in business. While I don't want to necessarily take this one to the bank just yet, it's a powerful combination of a company on the move and filmmaker who can call his own shots. Plus, J.J. is already talking, and he never does that.
</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-5728067.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Two New 'Wolfman' Posters, And One Is Even Good</title><category>Anthony Hopkins</category><category>Benicio Del Toro</category><category>Emily Blunt</category><category>Horror Movies</category><category>Hugo Weaving</category><category>Monster Movies</category><category>Posters</category><category>Remakes</category><category>Wolf Man</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:30:49 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2009/11/7/two-new-wolfman-posters-and-one-is-even-good.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:5727839</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana">What to do about <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0780653/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>The Wolfman</i></font></a><font face="Verdana">? Originally, this was a fantastic idea. Universal was going all the way back to its vaults and reintroducing the monster movies of the 1930s, most of which have stood the test of time. You had <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0738796/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Rick Baker </font></a><font face="Verdana">doing make-up effects (the created the Oscar in that category for his work on <i>An American Werewolf in London</i>, still unsurpassed), and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0780653/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Mark Romanek</font></a><font face="Verdana"> (<i>One Hour Photo</i>) lined up to direct <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001125/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Benicio Del Toro</font></a><font face="Verdana">, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000164/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Anthony Hopkins</font></a><font face="Verdana">, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1289434/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Emily Blunt</font></a><font face="Verdana">, and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0915989/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Hugo Weaving</font></a><font face="Verdana">.
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/posters/09/wolfman08_crop.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana">
Romanek left and was replaced by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0002653/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Joe Johnston</font></a><font face="Verdana"> (<i>Jurrasic Park III</i>) and then there were grumblings that the visual effects were so bad a fair percentage of them had to be redone. The movie went from April to November to the following February, and that's where we are now: A re-tooled bit of classic monster madness opening on Valentine's Day, already carrying more than its share of dashed expectations.
</font><p></p><font face="Verdana">
Here are the two latest posters for <i>The Wolfman</i>. One's pretty good, the other one has been Photoshopped to death (and bears a striking resemblance to <a href="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/posters/09/wrong_turn.jpg" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">a poster for <i>Wrong Turn</i></font></a><font face="Verdana">, and that can't be good).</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-5727839.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>'9/11' Tops 'Telegraph' Movies of the Decade List</title><category>Documentary</category><category>Lists</category><category>Michael Moore</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:11:11 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2009/11/7/911-tops-telegraph-movies-of-the-decade-list.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:5727696</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana">We're just a couple months away from the acknowledged end of the decade (it's really next year, because there was never a year zero, so this decade actually ends in 2010), and that means we'll get Best of the Decade lists on top of Best of the Year lists. I'm actually looking forward to the process myself and I'm revisiting some of the 25 movies or so I think have a chance to make my own list.
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/pics/09/fahrenheit911.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana">
<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/6501160/Top-100-movies-defining-the-noughties-00s-in-film.html" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>The Telegraph</i></font></a><font face="Verdana"> has unveiled a top 100 list, but not necessarily in terms of quality. Instead, we have the most significant hundred films from the past decade, the movies that "defined" the decade. There are, of course, some picks you'll certainly agree with; we have the top 25 listed and you can read the paper's entire list and see even more great films. But their selection of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0361596/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>Fahrenheit 9/11</i></font></a><font face="Verdana"> as the number one movie of the past ten years is almost completely unqualified. 
</font><p></p><font face="Verdana">
<blockquote>"It may not have been the best film of the decade. It may not have been the best film Moore has made (that honour still belongs to 1989’s Roger and Me). Nevertheless, it’s hard to overstate the importance of this film, a modestly funded political documentary that was shunned by its Disney backers but went on to win the Palme d’Or at Cannes, coin more than $220 million around the world, and boost the emergence of politically liberal, agenda-driven multiplex fare such as <em>Supersize Me</em> (sic) and <em>An Inconvenient Truth</em>."</blockquote>
</font><p></p><font face="Verdana">
I can think of one problem right away: <i>Super Size Me</i> came out about two months before <i>Fahrenheit 9/11</i> and spent three weeks in summer 2004 in the top ten despite only playing in a couple hundred theaters. So I can't see how <i>9/11</i> had a tremendous impact on Morgan Spurlock's movie.<p></p>Secondly, while there have been great documentaries since 2004, this decade may have seen even better documentaries before <I>Fahrenheit 9/11</i>, and I'd argue that Moore's film might have actually diluted the effectiveness of the non-fiction film, based in part on his reliance on shaky half-truths to tell a more incendiary story. There's a fair amount of tabloid journalism in that film, and I'm not sure that's what the format is supposed to foster.
</font><p></p><font face="Verdana">
So here's the top 25 films of the past decade, according to the editors of <I>The Telegraph</i>:
</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-5727696.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Director Julie Taymor Unveils Broadway's Spider-Man</title><category>Broadway</category><category>Evan Rachel Wood</category><category>Julie Taymor</category><category>Spider-Man</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:06:03 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2009/11/7/director-julie-taymor-unveils-broadways-spider-man.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:5727629</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana">It will not be Jim Sturgess slinging webs on Broadway in the new comic book musical <a href="http://spidermanonbroadway.marvel.com/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>Spider-Man Turn of the Dark</i></font></a><font face="Verdana">. Instead, director <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0853380/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Julie Taymor</font></a><font face="Verdana"> (<i>Across the Universe</i>) has hired another young actor she recently cast in a film version of Shakespeare's <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1274300/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>The Tempest</i></font></a><font face="Verdana">. <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0138840/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Reeve Carney</font></a><font face="Verdana"> will play Peter Parker to <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0939697/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Evan Rachel Wood</font></a><font face="Verdana">'s Mary Jane Watson, and here's a look at the 26-year-old actor.
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/pics/09/reevecarney01.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana">
In addition to acting, Carney is the lead singer of a band that features his last name, and is the final piece of the puzzle to the 2010 Marvel musical, which will open at the Hilton Theatre in New York in a few months. “Having recently finished shooting <i>The Tempest</i> with Reeve as the young prince, I am thrilled to cast him in an entirely different role as Peter Parker in <i>Spider-Man</i>," Taymor said in a statement. 
</font><p></p><font face="Verdana">
"When I first saw Reeve, he was performing with his terrific band Carney. The music of Bono and Edge requires an extraordinary talent— not only is Reeve a great rock and roll singer but his acting is equally fresh and authentic.” 
</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-5727629.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Gyllenhaal, Portman, Maguire - New 'Brothers' Trailer</title><category>Brothers</category><category>Jake Gyllenhaal</category><category>Natalie Portman</category><category>Tobey Maguire</category><category>Trailers</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:20:31 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2009/11/6/gyllenhaal-portman-maguire-new-brothers-trailer.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:5725401</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana">I would have thought <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0765010/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>Brothers</i></font></a><font face="Verdana"> would be in the conversation by now. You know the conversation, the end-of-the-year talk where movies come out of nowhere to gain the indie world's rapt attention. But so far, it's kind of flying under the radar.
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/posters/09/brotherspostercrop.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana">
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000204/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Natalie Portman</font></a><font face="Verdana">, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0350453/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Jake Gyllenhaal</font></a><font face="Verdana">, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001497/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Tobey Maguire</font></a><font face="Verdana">, and six-time Oscar nominee <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0006487/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Jim Sheridan</font></a><font face="Verdana"> are a pretty good foursome. Seriously, Jim Sheridan has six Academy Award nominations, so maybe <i>Brothers</I> being under the radar is par for the course. (No more golf references, I promise.) The lone trouble spot - unless it's just terribly maudlin - is that this has a war undertone. That won't diminish the quality of the film, but it could stand in its way when it comes to finding an audience.
</font><p></p><font face="Verdana">
There's a new version of the trailer, heavier on the Portman, methinks. The film will be in theaters on December 4th, so there's enough time to turn around its fortunes if it's as good as it certainly could be.

</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-5725401.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Get Your Name on the 'Paranormal Activity' DVD</title><category>DVD</category><category>Horror Movies</category><category>Paranormal Activity</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:46:01 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2009/11/6/get-your-name-on-the-paranormal-activity-dvd.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:5721842</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana">There's a great opportunity for <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1179904/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>Paranormal Activity</i></font></a><font face="Verdana"> fans to have one final, permanent connection with the micro-budgeted horror flick/multiplex phenom. Paramount is giving the fans a chance to have their names featured on the DVD credits. 
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/posters/09/paranormalactivity_crop.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana">
This has been done before, and it's always a bit of a publicity stunt, but that shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone who has followed <I>Paranormal</i> from its "Demand It" infancy to back-to-back $20 million weekends to the most profitable movie ever made and a date with $100 million any day now. The success of this film has as much to do with creating buzz as it does the movie itself.
</font><p></p><font face="Verdana">
It's impossibly easy to get your name listed; <a href="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/stuff/activitydvdcredits.jpg" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">it took me about ten seconds</font></a><font face="Verdana"> and I'm a gigantic moron. So just go to <a href="http://www.paranormalactivityproject.com/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">ParanormalActivityProject.com</font></a><font face="Verdana"> and sign up. First and last name, e-mail, and date of birth is all you need.</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-5721842.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Aykroyd, Faris, JT in Talks for 'Yogi Bear'</title><category>3D</category><category>Animation</category><category>Anna Faris</category><category>Justin Timberlake</category><category>TV Adaptations</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:06:12 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2009/11/6/aykroyd-faris-jt-in-talks-for-yogi-bear.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:5720989</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana">If these things lived in a vacuum, it might be a different story. On its own, there's nothing wrong or inherently evil about making a movie based on <i>The Flintstones</I> or <I>Scooby Doo</i> or even <i>Rocky & Bullwinkle</i>. But when you add them all up (and pay attention to the success rate), you start to get a bad taste in your mouth. That's probably why I was so opposed to this update initially.
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/tv/yogi.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana">
I enjoyed <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1302067/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>Yogi Bear</i></font></a><font face="Verdana"> as a kid, although it wasn't an all-time favorite. And because it has a big presence in the pop culture firmament, a movie version isn't a stretch. It just seems that way since we've been inundated by so many of them already. <a href="http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/11/05/exclusive-anna-faris-to-star-in-yogi-bear/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>Entertainment Weekly</i></font></a><font face="Verdana"> has some casting updates, and I'm not really thrilled about those, either.
</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-5720989.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Deleted Scene: Brüno Sits Down With Pete Rose</title><category>Bruno</category><category>DVD</category><category>Sacha Baron Cohen</category><category>Video</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:03:23 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2009/11/6/deleted-scene-bruno-sits-down-with-pete-rose.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:5719408</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana"><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0889583/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>Brüno</i></font></a><font face="Verdana"> was damn funny in small doses, but as an entire movie, it kind of lost its way. But when the film comes out on DVD November 17th, it will have a few more small doses, like this deleted scene with Pete Rose.
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/prod/09/bruno92.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana">
If you saw the film, you know that <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0056187/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Sacha Baron Cohen</font></a><font face="Verdana"> tried the same stunt with Paula Abdul, using "migrant workers" as makeshift furniture for an interview. I didn't think it would be funny the second time through, but I was kind of wrong about that. I don't love the clip, but it's so weird to see Pete Rose here that it's worth a quick look.
</font><p></p><font face="Verdana">
The only trouble is, Rose is so well-known for taking any payday at this point that this one could be a complete plant. Sure, he's seen a lot of strange things in his day, but I think I'd be a little less go-with-the-flow than Charlie Hustle is here.
</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-5719408.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Portman Calls 'Black Swan' Sex Scene "Extreme"</title><category>Black Swan</category><category>Darren Aronofsky</category><category>Mila Kunis</category><category>Natalie Portman</category><category>Nude Scenes</category><category>Sex Scenes</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:56:46 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2009/11/6/portman-calls-black-swan-sex-scene-extreme.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:5719009</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana">We've gotten plenty of traffic here at The Big Picture thanks to <a href="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2009/8/21/portman-kunis-get-freaky-in-black-swan.html" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">the story</font></a><font face="Verdana"> alleging that <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000204/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Natalie Portman</font></a><font face="Verdana"> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005109/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Mila Kunis</font></a><font face="Verdana"> will have mad sapphic sex in <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0004716/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Darren Aronofsky</font></a><font face="Verdana">'s <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0947798/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>Black Swan</i></font></a><font face="Verdana">, so thanks for the hits. Portman recently talked to <a href="http://vmagazine.com/issue.php?n=14058" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>V</i> magazine</font></a><font face="Verdana"> about the film and the scene, and while she makes a semantics argument against what's been reported, Natalie is certainly not denying it.
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/pics/09/portmankunis.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana">
"It's not raunchy - it's extreme," <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33626356/ns/entertainment-access_hollywood/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">she said</font></a><font face="Verdana">. I'm sure there's a difference, if only qualitatively. The tone of the profile makes me think that the extreme scene will involve nudity. Both Portman and Kunis have done nude scenes before, Portman in the short <i>Hotel Chevalier</i> and Kunis in some direct-to-video thing, but now Portman says she's more open to that possibility than she would have been earlier in her career.
</font><p></p><font face="Verdana">
"Previously I was figuring out my own sexual identity, likes and dislikes and all that stuff, and it's weird to be doing stuff on film as you're figuring it out," she said. "Also, being a sexual object when you're a kid is really uncomfortable." Well, yes. There's that.
</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-5719009.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>