<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.1 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:50:56 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Get The Big Picture</title><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.9.1 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Cool New 'Clash of the Titans' Poster</title><category>3D</category><category>Clash of the Titans</category><category>Posters</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:52:35 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2010/2/9/cool-new-clash-of-the-titans-poster.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:6630925</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana">There's a new <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0800320" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>Clash of the Titans</i></font></a><font face="Verdana"> poster from <a href="http://impawards.com/2010/clash_of_the_titans_ver5.html" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">IMP</font></a><font face="Verdana">, marking its arrival as a 3-D sword n' sandal movie on April 2nd. I think it's safe to say the Kraken has been released...
</font><p></p><center><a href="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/posters/10/titans_kraken.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/posters/10/titans_kraken_small.jpg"></a><br>Click to Enlarge the Krakren</center><p></p><font face="Verdana"> 
Our source close to this production swears that 3-D is the way to go. He's seen it and told me weeks before it was made official that a release date change was the only way the studio would go ahead with the technological upgrade. So we'll take his word for it when he says the 3-D will make a vast improvement.</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-6630925.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Tim Robbins Sires Peter Sarsgaard in 'Green Lantern'</title><category>Blake Lively</category><category>Casting Couch</category><category>Comic Book Movies</category><category>DC Comics</category><category>Green Lantern</category><category>Peter Sarsgaard</category><category>Ryan Reynolds</category><category>Tim Robbins</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:18:31 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2010/2/9/tim-robbins-sires-peter-sarsgaard-in-green-lantern.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:6629288</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana">He was rumored to be in <i>Iron Man 2</i>, but now <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000209/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Tim Robbins</font></a><font face="Verdana"> is more or less confirmed to co-star in another superhero flick, DC's <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1133985/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><I>Green Lantern</i></font></a><font face="Verdana">. He's the latest name to join <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005351/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Ryan Reynolds</font></a><font face="Verdana"> in the cast, and shooting commences next month in New Orleans, which should almost be done celebrating the Super Bowl and Mardi Gras around then.
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/pics/tim-robbins.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana">
<a href="http://www.heatvisionblog.com/2010/02/tim-robbins-green-lantern-senator-hammond.html" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Heat Vision Blog</font></a><font face="Verdana"> indicates Robbins will play Sen. Hammond, father of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0765597/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Peter Sarsgaard</font></a><font face="Verdana">'s villainous Hector Hammond. And, for no reason at all, there is also a mention of Robbins' work in <i>Howard th Duck</i>, which is really a cheap shot. In addition to Robbins and Sarsgaard, director <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0132709/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Martin Campbell</font></a><font face="Verdana"> has expressed interest in uber-bad guy <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0835016/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Mark Strong</font></a><font face="Verdana"> for the role of Sinestro and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0515116/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Blake Lively</font></a><font face="Verdana"> will go all van der Woodsen on the role of Carol Ferris, Lantern's main squeeze.</font><p></p><font face="Verdana">

Apropos of nothing, that's a tall cast. Reynolds and Strong are 6' 2", Sarsgaard - perhaps a tad generously - is billed at six feet even, and Lively is 5' 10". Add the 6' 5" Robbins to the mix and I think you can safely say there won't be a Tom Cruise cameo.
</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-6629288.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>'Terminator' Rights Sold for $29.5 Million</title><category>Terminator</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:27:47 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2010/2/9/terminator-rights-sold-for-295-million.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:6627345</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana">We've been following the financial fates of <I>Terminator</I> ever since Halcyon declared bankruptcy late last summer, just two months after the release of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0438488/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><I>Terminator Salvation</I></font></a><font face="Verdana"> and only two years after the company acquired those rights for $30 million. Now there's a new sherrif in town, although technically, it's the same sherrif.
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/stuff/terminator_art.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana">
Pacificor reportedly swooped in at the last moment and upped the ante to $29.5 million. That was significantly more than Lionsgate initial offer of $15 million plus 5% of future grosses. While the grosses may have played out in Halcyon's favor, beggars can't be choosers and they have a lot of debt. <p></p>Curiously, though, most of that debt is already owed to - wait for it - Pacificor, the company that lent producers Victor Kubicek and Derek Anderson cash so they could buy <i>Terminator</I> in 2007, and now the proud owner of John and Sarah Connor. What a tangled web we weave.
</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-6627345.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>'24' Movie Looking More and More Likely</title><category>24</category><category>Kiefer Sutherland</category><category>TV Adaptations</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:52:27 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2010/2/9/24-movie-looking-more-and-more-likely.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:6625877</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana"><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0285331/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>24</i></font></a><font face="Verdana"> may not be the consistent ratings powerhouse it was a few years ago, having surrendered that spot on Fox to <i>House</i> in terms of scripted drama, but it still has a very loyal following, one that grows with special episodes, like season premieres and last year's two-hour movie event. So now, it looks like the Jack Bauer feature film is closer than ever.
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/tv/24kiefer.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana">
<a href="http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2010/02/08/breaking-news-24-movie-inching-closer-to-reality/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>Entertainment Weekly</i></font></a><font face="Verdana"> says that <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0712753/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Billy Ray</font></a><font face="Verdana"> (<i>State of Play, Shattered Glass, Breach</i>) has been contacted to write the script and that he has already pitched a concept to producers. Personally, I'd rather dance with the one that brought me than look outside for writing help, although Ray certainly does well with high-minded political intrigue.
</font><p></p><font face="Verdana">
This isn't the first time talk about a <i>24</I> movie has come up, although there is apparently legitimate concern that the show won't be back after this season. It's very expensive to shoot and again, ratings aren't what they were, even though it still gets over 10 million households a week for a new episode. <p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-6625877.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>'Jaws' Rebooted? We're Gonna Need a Bigger Reason</title><category>3D</category><category>Remakes</category><category>Steven Spielberg</category><category>Universal Studios</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:26:24 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2010/2/9/jaws-rebooted-were-gonna-need-a-bigger-reason.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:6620833</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana">I don't enjoy this one at all: Is Universal really planning a remake of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073195/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>Jaws</i></font></a><font face="Verdana">? Oh, eff off.
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/posters/10/jaws_wide.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana"> 
Here's the story, if you can stand it: <a href="http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Universal-Planning-A-3D-Remake-Of-Jaws-With-Tracy-Morgan-16954.html" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Cinema Blend</font></a><font face="Verdana"> cites a source at the studio as saying da U wants to pursue a 3-D <i>Jaws</i>, apparently blithely unaware that they've already made one of those and it is among the worst studio pictures ever produced, and yet it's still better than <I>Jaws: The Revenge</i>.</font><p></p><font face="Verdana">

The idea is that <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0605079/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Tracy Morgan</font></a><font face="Verdana"> would play the Richard Dreyfuss role in the remake, and that's not exactly worth the wait, either, do you think? We'll see if there's anything to it; right now, this is just "inside sources" and there's been no confirmation from Universal. Who could blame them for not opening up, though. This <em>is</em> pretty shameful.</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-6620833.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Soderbergh, Damon Catch a 'Contagion'</title><category>Casting Couch</category><category>Jude Law</category><category>Kate Winslet</category><category>Marion Cotillard</category><category>Matt Damon</category><category>Steven Soderbergh</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:29:10 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2010/2/9/soderbergh-damon-catch-a-contagion.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:6620708</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana">It's been an odd few months for <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001752/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Steven Soderbergh</font></a><font face="Verdana">. He went from the four-hour bio-pic of Che Guevara to a movie starring a real 

life porn star (both Sasha Grey and <i>The Girlfriend Experience</i> got good reviews) to being forcibly removed from <i>Moneyball</i> literally 

hours before cameras were to start rolling to the mini-comeback <i>The Informant!</i> to yet another change of direction.
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/pics/10/soderbergh_damon.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana"> 
<a href="http://theplaylist.blogspot.com/2010/02/soderbergh-flips-liberace-for-contagion.html" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">The Playlist</font></a><font face="Verdana"> says that Soderbergh is putting on hold another bio-pic (that Liberace movie with <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000354/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Matt Damon</font></a><font face="Verdana"> and Michael Douglas in the title role), 

but this time, it seems like a really good reason. Soderbergh is tackling a script by <i>Informant!</I> writer <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1994243/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Scott Z. Burns</font></a><font face="Verdana"> called 

<i>Contagion</i>. The site reports that the script is a globetrotting action thrilla about a viral outbreak that is described as "terrifying."
</font><p></p><font face="Verdana">
That alone might be worth it. But check out the propsed cast: Damon, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000701/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Kate Winslet</font></a><font face="Verdana">, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0182839/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Marion Cotillard</font></a><font face="Verdana">, and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000179/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Jude Law</font></a><font face="Verdana">. For a time, Law made just about every movie 

he was in immediately better. That vanished after he found some success, but I think he's back on track. Damon and Winslet do consistently great 

work that audiences and critics alike rally behind. Cotillard...if you don't know, now you know. She's the real deal and the only reason to see 

<i>Nine</i>.</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-6620708.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>'Get Him To The Greek' Now Opening June 4th</title><category>Comedies</category><category>Get Him to the Greek</category><category>Jonah Hill</category><category>Russell Brand</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:48:34 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2010/2/9/get-him-to-the-greek-now-opening-june-4th.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:6615789</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana"><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1226229/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>Get Him to the Greek</I></font></a><font face="Verdana">, an off-shoot of <I>Forgetting Sarah Marshall</i>, will arrive in theaters one week earlier than expected. Not a major change, but <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/schedule/?view=bydate&release=theatrical&date=2010-07-02&showweeks=5&p=.htm" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Box Office Mojo</font></a><font face="Verdana"> says the comedy will now open on June 4th instead of the 11th.
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/prod/10/gethimgreek.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana">
Why the change? (Shrug) Dunno. It could be a loose combination of factors, such as <i>The Hangover</i> opened in the same slot last year (superstitious studios play that game a lot), it would give <i>Greek</i> an extra seven days before <i>Grown-Ups</i> opens at the end of June, and it's the first male-oriented comedy of the summer, so why put it off any longer than you need to?
</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-6615789.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Useless Reboot #44: 'Mr. and Mrs. Smith'</title><category>Angelina Jolie</category><category>Brad Pitt</category><category>Remakes</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:01:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2010/2/8/useless-reboot-44-mr-and-mrs-smith.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:6615590</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana">Don't shoot the messenger; we just report 'em. Having said that, how in the world can anyone be serious about a reboot of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0356910/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>Mr. and Mrs. Smith</i></font></a><font face="Verdana">? It's not even five years old, didn't spawn a sequel, and is so generic by nature that you don't even need to steal the concept. And yet...
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/posters/10/smith_combo.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana">
<a href="http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/02/now_theres_a_mr_and_mrs_smith.html" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Vulture</font></a><font face="Verdana"> writes that Fox's Regency is piecing together "a quasi-prequel" to the Brangelina flick, although they would not be involved in the new epic. That's primarily an economic decision, since both stars command in the $15 - $20 million range now. Then again, <I>Little Fockers</i> has three contracts that size, so there you go.
</font><p></p><font face="Verdana">
The idea is simple enough: Keep the brand and people will come back for more. However, this is like New Coke to me. The formula Fox had the first time was just about perfect, and good luck finding a better tandem with broiling sexual chemistry with two other stars people are already interested in seeing. The truth is, chemistry can't be bought and it can't be manufactured. It either is or it isn't. <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000093/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Brad</font></a><font face="Verdana"> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001401/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Angelina</font></a><font face="Verdana"> have plenty of it and always have.
</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-6615590.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Marvel Adding Team of Heroes to 'Captain America'</title><category>Avengers</category><category>Captain America</category><category>Comic Book Movies</category><category>Marvel Comics</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:11:15 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2010/2/8/marvel-adding-team-of-heroes-to-captain-america.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:6614422</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana">This stuff really isn't rocket surgery, so why is it that so many potential blockbusters seem to be handcuffed by overthinking the process? If you're going to give us a <i>Captain America</I> movie, give us Captain America. And if you have to call it <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0458339/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><i>The First Avenger: Captain America</i></font></a><font face="Verdana"> because you're building to a greatest hits movie the next summer featuring other <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0848228/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Avengers</font></a><font face="Verdana">...don't put <i>even more</i> superheroes in Cap's first movie.
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/comics/cap_slung.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana">
We found out over the weekend that, for some reason, <a href="http://www.getthebigpicture.net" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Steve Rogers has to join the USO</font></a><font face="Verdana"> in order to wear his American flag-inspired outfit. I don't understand it, either: Lee Effing Greenwood can wear <a href="http://blog.newsok.com/staticblog/files/2008/11/lee-greenwood.jpg" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">this tasteless leather monstrosity</font></a><font face="Verdana"> whenever he wants, but a super soldier has to join a song-and-dance group? Pointless.
</font><p></p><font face="Verdana">
Now here's worse news:<a href="http://chud.com/articles/articles/22433/1/CAPTAIN-AMERICA039S-INTERNATIONAL-CO-STARS-THE-INVADERS/Page1.html" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"> CHUD reports</font></a><font face="Verdana"> that Marvel is so keen to introduce The Invaders in <i>Captain America</I> that they're essentially going to dominate half the movie. Director <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0002653/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Joe Johnston</font></a><font face="Verdana"> confirmed as much, saying The Invaders are "in the entire second half," and that there will be six of them fighting alongside Cap in the WWII-period action flick. Six? As in more than five? Then why the hell do you need Captain America? Doesn't he have troops to entertain with Betty Grable and Bob Hope?
</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-6614422.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Trailer - Colin Farrell in Neil Jordan's 'Ondine'</title><category>Colin Farrell</category><category>Trailers</category><dc:creator>Colin Boyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:27:45 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2010/2/8/trailer-colin-farrell-in-neil-jordans-ondine.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">217610:2233382:6613743</guid><description><![CDATA[<font face="Verdana">It's been a while since I enjoyed a <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001403/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Neil Jordan</font></a><font face="Verdana"> film. <i>The Brave One</i> had its moments, but it was better in theory, ditto <i>Breakfast on Pluto</i>. I was at the Toronto premiere of <i>The Good Thief</i>, which wasn't terribly arresting, and actually, I think my favorite of his might have to be <I>Mona Lisa</i>, which is nearly 25 years old. 
</font><p></p><center><img src="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/storage/trailers/ondine.jpg"></center><p></p><font face="Verdana">
The odd thing is, I always kind of figured Jordan was one of those directors who made really good movies, and then I looked at his list of movies...it's really not that inspiring. Air Jordan is back with another one, the mermaid drama <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1235796/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119"><I>Ondine</i></font></a><font face="Verdana">.
</font><p></p><font face="Verdana">
And yes, "mermaid drama" means exactly what you'd think it means, and is not some euphemism for a fish-out-of-water story. Although, come to think of it, that probably applies, too. But it's a mermaid, all right, and in the role of Tom Hanks: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0268199/" style="text-decoration: none"><font color="#BE2119">Colin Farrell</font></a><font face="Verdana">.
</font><p></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-6613743.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>